Latter Red Cliff in Zhao Bosu Style by Wen Zhengming illustrated guide

Latter Red Cliff in Zhao Bosu Style: Wen Zhengming

Latter Red Cliff in Zhao Bosu Style by Wen Zhengming illustrated guide
Explore Wen Zhengming’s Latter Red Cliff scroll through Su Shi’s story, Zhao Bosu’s earlier model, light blue-green color and Wen Jia’s revealing colophon.

目次

Quick Answer: What Is Latter Red Cliff in Zhao Bosu Style?

Latter Red Cliff in Zhao Bosu Style (仿赵伯骕后赤壁图, Fǎng Zhào Bósù Hòu Chìbì Tú) is a 1548 handscroll by Wen Zhengming, painted in ink and color on silk and held by the National Palace Museum, Taipei. Its picture measures 31.5 × 541.6 cm. Wen painted after an older model associated with Zhao Bosu; the literary subject comes from Su Shi. The title therefore names an artistic lineage, rather than making Zhao Bosu the painter of this surviving Ming scroll.[1]

Latter Red Cliff in Zhao Bosu Style authorship and scroll viewing guide
Latter Red Cliff in Zhao Bosu Style authorship and scroll viewing guide

The easiest way into this long landscape is to keep its three layers apart: a writer’s excursion, an earlier painter’s interpretation, and Wen’s later response. They give you a way to connect the small figures, changing terrain and writing at the end.

The Scroll at a Glance

項目Identification
芸術家Wen Zhengming
日付1548, Ming dynasty
FormatHandscroll
媒体Ink and color on silk
Picture dimensions31.5 cm high × 541.6 cm long
CollectionNational Palace Museum, Taipei
Alternative English titleAfter Zhao Bosu’s Latter Ode on the Red Cliff (后赤壁赋, Hòu Chìbì Fù)

These dimensions describe the painted silk, not the entire mounted object. The trailing paper carries later writing, so the physical scroll combines different surfaces and voices. The dated painter’s inscription establishes the Ming work’s identity more securely than a shortened English title alone.[1]

Who Wrote, Modeled and Painted This Work?

The underlying text is the Latter Ode on the Red Cliff by Su Shi. It provides the excursion and its shifts of mood. Zhao Bosu supplied the older pictorial model named in the title; Wen Zhengming made the surviving 1548 painting. Wen Jia, the painter’s son, added a colophon explaining its circumstances.[1][2]

役割Person役割
Literary authorSu ShiWrote the excursion that supplies the subject
Earlier pictorial modelZhao BosuAssociated with the older painting Wen followed
Painter of this scrollWen ZhengmingCreated the surviving Ming interpretation
Colophon writerWen JiaRecorded an account of why his father made it

Wen Jia’s account says a Suzhou owner faced pressure to surrender the older painting to a powerful official. Wen offered to paint another version so his friend would retain something of its appearance. This is a story preserved in the colophon: it explains how the work was remembered, rather than independently proving every stage of the earlier painting’s movement.[3]

The distinction also changes how to read “after” or “in the style of.” Those words acknowledge a relationship to an earlier work. They do not establish that every detail was mechanically copied or that Wen’s own handling disappears.

From a Return Trip to Eight Pictorial Sections

The scroll organizes the subject into eight sections. Its opening premise is modest: Su Shi and two companions bring wine and fish back to the Red Cliff. That ordinary preparation matters because the literary excursion develops into an increasingly unsettled encounter with landscape.[2]

In the text, the river and cliffs appear transformed by the season and water level. Su climbs where his companions cannot follow; exhilaration gives way to sadness and fear. He returns to the boat, a solitary crane passes, and a later dream introduces a mysterious Daoist encounter. The close leaves recognition unresolved.[4]

Use that changing emotional direction as a guide to the picture, rather than expecting a single panoramic instant. A passage through hills, water and human activity can suggest elapsed time as well as distance. Eight pictorial sections are not eight separate paintings, and a thumbnail montage can hide the connections between them.

Do not assign a precise literary episode to every patch of rock without checking a sufficiently detailed reproduction. Recognizing the broader movement—from sociable outing toward solitude and uncertainty—is more useful than attaching confident labels to indistinct figures.

Light Blue-Green Color and Wen’s Brushwork

Light blue-and-green coloring gives the scroll a restrained luminosity. Its translucent handling and layered effect have been related to Zhao Mengfu’s literati approach, while the construction of mountains and the treatment of branches and foliage retain Wen’s own character.[2][3]

Look at color and ink together. A pale wash may establish a slope, but the lines and clustered marks determine how that slope holds together. The contrast between small, simply drawn figures and rhythmically built rocks lets a human story unfold inside a much larger painted environment.[2]

For readers exploring Chinese landscape painting, this is a useful case of artistic inheritance with individual handling. Compare the weight of a contour, the spacing of vegetation and the openness of water before deciding that color alone defines the style. “Blue-green” is an entry point for looking, rather than a complete explanation of the painting.

Following the Scroll and Its Colophon

Handscrolls were designed for successive viewing, normally from right to left, rather than permanent exposure as a single wall-sized image. Later inscriptions can add interpretation and collecting history beyond the painted narrative.[5]

  1. Establish the viewing direction. Find the start of the painting and follow it in manageable sections; use the overall view only to recover your position.
  2. Track changes around the figures. Compare their scale with nearby rocks, paths and water. Ask how the setting opens or closes as the excursion develops.
  3. Separate story from technique. Make one pass for the movement of people, then another for pale color, ink structure and vegetation. This avoids reducing every brushmark to a plot clue.
  4. Read the trailing writing separately. Identify who wrote a colophon before using it as evidence. Wen Jia’s account concerns the painting’s making, while the landscape interprets Su Shi’s excursion.

The broader guide to Chinese painting inscriptions and seals helps distinguish an artist’s dated inscription from later responses. That distinction is especially valuable here: the work’s story extends beyond what the landscape alone shows.

FAQs About Latter Red Cliff in Zhao Bosu Style

Did Zhao Bosu write the Latter Ode on the Red Cliff?

No. Su Shi wrote the literary text. Zhao Bosu’s name identifies the older pictorial model associated with Wen Zhengming’s later painting.

Is this Su Shi’s Ode to the Red Cliff calligraphy?

No. This is a Ming painting based on the Latter Ode. Su Shi’s Ode to the Red Cliff calligraphy is a separate object associated with the Former Ode.[6]

Does the scroll depict the Battle of Red Cliffs?

Its subject is Su Shi’s literary excursion, rather than a reconstruction of the battle. Read the figures as participants in that outing and its imaginative development.

出典

[1] National Palace Museum. Copy of Chao Po-su’s Poetic Sentiment of the Latter Ode on the Red Cliff, collection record

[2] National Palace Museum. A Closer Look at Chinese Painting, After Zhao Bosu’s Latter Ode on the Red Cliff

[3] National Palace Museum. Imitating Zhao Bosu’s Illustration of the Latter Red Cliff, past exhibition introduction

[4] Su Shi. Latter Ode on the Red Cliff, Chinese text

[5] The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Chinese Handscrolls

[6] National Palace Museum. Su Shi, Ode on the Red Cliff, collection record